June 2004 - admin@common-lisp.net - mailman3.common-lisp.net

[admin] added lispbox; owned by mdanish
by root 08 Jun '04

08 Jun '04

Add successful at 2004.06.08.11.56.

1 0

[admin] New admin
by Nikodemus Siivola 08 Jun '04

08 Jun '04

Common-lisp.net has gained a new admin, Luke Gorrie of the Slime fame. Welcome Luke, -- Nikodemus "Not as clumsy or random as a C++ or Java. An elegant weapon for a more civilized time."

1 0

[admin] (no subject)
by Paul Werkowski 08 Jun '04

08 Jun '04

| You're receiving this email because your common-lisp.net home directory | contains no pubkey.asc, but does hold .ssh/authorized_keys. Please explain why this is needed. | Please verify that you have access, and put you GPG public key in your | home directory as pubkey.asc. You can get GPG to export it with the | command "gpg --armor --export <name>". This doesn't work. It tells me to see the FAQ. What is <name>? Paul

2 1

[admin] Lisp in a box project
by mrd 08 Jun '04

08 Jun '04

Project name: lispbox Name: Matthew Danish Description: A quick and easy to install Lisp IDE for various platforms. License: Some portions GPL and the rest MIT/X

4 4

[admin] test, ignore
by Nikodemus Siivola 07 Jun '04

07 Jun '04

Does mailman work now? Cheers, -- Nikodemus "Not as clumsy or random as a C++ or Java. An elegant weapon for a more civilized time."

2 1

[admin] added ieeefp-tests; owned by crhodes
by root 04 Jun '04

04 Jun '04

Add successful at 2004.06.04.10.23.

1 0

[admin] added aspectl; owned by pcostanza
by root 04 Jun '04

04 Jun '04

Add successful at 2004.06.04.10.17.

1 0

[admin] added s-xml-rpc; owned by bmastenbrook
by root 04 Jun '04

04 Jun '04

Add successful at 2004.06.04.06.31.

1 0

[admin] added s-xml; owned by bmastenbrook
by root 04 Jun '04

04 Jun '04

Add successful at 2004.06.04.06.27.

1 0

[admin] non-us.common-lisp.net
by Nikodemus Siivola 04 Jun '04

04 Jun '04

Sorry for the huge delay, especially to Tâle who's probably getting tired of waiting. Problem: We need a non-us server for crypto. Solutions: * Frode has kindly offered us space from his uni's servers for this purpose. Pros: - free as beer - if we update our infra for this we might be able to adopt a more distributed outlook in the future. Cons: - we'd be unlikely to have root access (?), so integrating with the existing infra might be tricky * Getting a dedicated server from Europe. Mario and I have both asked for quotes, and they have been reasonable. We've also talked about splitting cost between us. Pros: - probably simpler to integrate with the us server - we'd have root Cons: - costs a bit Suggestion: It was the feeling of Mario and I that having root access would in the long run be simpler. I propose that either I or Mario get the second server. Mario: I can't recall the details, but I've the feeling that your best offer was better then mine -- I'll dig them up and send you the details for comparison. Frode, would it be possible to have your uni's servers *mirror* us? Not just the ftp, but the whole /project tree, for both us and non-us? If, as I seem to recall, you have plenty of bandwidth to spare, you could function as a primary mirror for clnet, one that other mirrors would sync from? I'm under the impression that a signigicant percentage of our bandwidth is being sucked up mirroring. On (not sure about the goodness) idea would be to relegate ftp entirely off the development servers: have the development servers push ftp to mirrors with little delay (constantly monitoring for new addition). Then we would have one less security hole to worry about in the future. Cheers, -- Nikodemus "Not as clumsy or random as a C++ or Java. An elegant weapon for a more civilized time."

1 0