Hello, hello.
Sorry to top post, but this is just to say that I've chosen to go with the MIT license as described here:
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
It's short and simple. I think it will do fine. Conversation about it has happened on #lisp.
I also have a couple of people interested in joining in. How hard is it to add people to the project after it is set up?
On Apr 27, 2005, at 4:15 PM, Mario S. Mommer wrote:
Hi,
David Steuber david@david-steuber.com writes:
I would like to create a new project called CL-Carbon to be hosted on your server. CL-Carbon is intended to be a CLOS application framework that wraps the Carbon APIs for OS X and usable with OpenMCL. Porting to other Lisps may be done as resources allow. SBCL for example would be a nice target when it supports threads and callbacks on OS X. CL-Carbon overcomes a current technical limitation on distribution of Cocoa based applications using OpenMCL. Unlike a Cocoa app, a Carbon app does not need to be recompiled when the OS is upgraded by a patch release via Software Update. A current application I have available[1] has been reported to run under Tiger without recompile. It was developed under Panther and not recompiled since 10.3.8. I am now running 10.3.9. Another benefit seems to be better application performance. Current Cocoa applications under OpenMCL appear to be slow.
CL-Carbon should provide the interested user with a way to build OS X applications in Lisp that are lightweight and fast. By dealing with certain boiler plate issues, development should be reasonably quick. This is an alternative to Cocoa rather than a replacement.
Looks good!
I am considering the LLGPL license for this project.
I have to insist you make up your mind first :-)
Regards,
Mario.