9 Mar
2004
9 Mar
'04
10:42 a.m.
Selon Mario Mommer <mommer@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>:
Approved, although...
Project name: image
...i would like to ask you to think about it again. "image" is perhaps too canonical as a name. After all, it is not an image, but a library to manipulate images.
IMHO, anyway.
Ok. I thought of the library as a kind of "canonical" one (hoping that it becomes a de facto standard for image manipulation, with lots of contributors and users), but that may seem too ambitious. I had a hard time thinking about an alternate name, Nikodemus suggested "imago" on #lisp, and I like it. Would that be valid? Thanks, -- Matthieu Villeneuve