21 Aug
2004
21 Aug
'04
6:13 p.m.
Nikodemus Siivola tsiivola@cc.hut.fi writes:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Brian Mastenbrook wrote:
Actually, the optimal solution would be to make an account for lisppaste with a larger quota, where others could log in via ssh public key and fix the bot (my user's authorized keys would be the initial set). Any chance of this happening?
This is a good idea anyways. What do others think?
We could move this kind of service to its own UML on the new box.