On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 01:34:40PM +0200, Mario Mommer wrote:
Erik, do we support arch? I remember we talked about it as a possibility, but I do not remember what was decided.
I don't think anythink got decided, but then again arch requires very little in the way of support: if the $project/ftp and $pubftp/project are in sync (or preferably the same directory), then the arch users are set up. ;)
Well, I wouldn't call a linear algebra package "linear algebra", or an XML parser "xml", because they aren't what their name sugests. I would prefer something along the lines of "ubf.lisp", or "cl-ubf", "UBF-in-CL" etc.
I'm get more and more agnostic on the naming issues as time passes by. ;) The only thing I'd comment against would be gratuitious .lisp postfixes and cl- prefixes, unless the project provides cl bindings to a foreign linbrary -- in which case cl-foo makes perfect sense. But I'm saying this "just for the record", not against cl-ubf as a name. I think a good guideline is: "Would you dedicate a CLiki page by that name to you project?". Cheers, -- Nikodemus