12 Sep
2003
12 Sep
'03
8:27 p.m.
Miles Egan miles@caddr.com writes:
Obvious seems better than precise in this case.
Heh, yeah, exactly, and to my ear "rfc2822" is obvious whereas "internet message format" isn't. Ah, a classic problem this. :-)
But let me make something clear: I don't /really/ care what the convention is. I do care that there is a convention and if we all can agree on one I'll happily follow it (I'll even rename my rfc2822 package).
So, is our plan so far: cl- for wrappers around libraries; proper nouns are preferable; RFCs use a shortned version of their title?
Erik.