Erik Enge eenge@prium.net writes:
Nikodemus Siivola nikodemus@random-state.net writes:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 08:46:12AM +0200, Mario Mommer wrote:
I wonder if it would be possible to host the project "GTKlisp" (1), stable and sturdy GTK bindings for Common Lisp, at common-lisp.net.
*approves* ;)
Ok, what about the name? "GTKlisp" makes me think of a Lisp implementation of GTK.
My other ideas were
GTKat ;; A silly pun.
lgtk
clgtk ;; people could confuse it with cl-gtk
gtkcl ;; what's sbcl then?
gtkl
gtknexus
gtk.cl
gtk.lisp
gtkclb ;; gtk common lisp bindings
;; I think CVS would barf on these:
(GTK)
:gtk
;; And then there is this one.
gtk_lisp_bindingswith_parens ;; another pun. It might even be funny ;; if you ever programmed with gtk :-)
could be abbreviated as glbwp.
cl-gtk would really be the best name, I suppose.
I would have used exactly this one, but it is already taken :-(
What about just gtk?
That would be confusing. Besides, I am not sure my bindings will end up being the only one alive.
If you want "GTKlisp" can I spell it "gtklisp" or do you want the crazycaps in there?
To be honest, the naming questions have delayed me asking for hosting. I really don't know wat's the best. I guess that after the the name has converged, the caps aren't important.
Regards, Mario