26 Aug
2003
26 Aug
'03
2:55 p.m.
Nikodemus Siivola nikodemus@random-state.net writes:
Are we going to keep handing out RFC-numbers as project names?
I don't think it is our job to do have any policy for project names. cCLan et al. seems to me to be the place to enforce that. Do you have an alternate strategy?
- If we get more of them out announcements suddenly become quite
unreadaable: "Huh? There's a new version of rfc-whazzanumber on common-lisp.net."
You mean like rfc2822-2 or rfc2388-theotherone? Yes, that will be slightly confusing. Do you have a suggestion for how we can do it better?
Erik.