On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 10:25:25PM +0300, Janis Dzerins wrote:
Ok, here's my analysis: jdz seems to be mostly sane enough, and he seems to have working code, so the vitals are ok.
Then the bad.
name: rfc2388
Are we going to keep handing out RFC-numbers as project names?
Reasons why I think it *may* be a bad policy:
* It hints at being authorative, yet nwither the interface nor the implementation is.
* If we get more of them out announcements suddenly become quite unreadaable: "Huh? There's a new version of rfc-whazzanumber on common-lisp.net."
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus