"Andreas Fuchs asf@boinkor.net" asf@boinkor.net writes:
Today, Mario Mommer mommer@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
I was hoping to get ftp space for an arch archive & download area for my UBF-in-CL package.
You do not want our version control facilities? Awww... :)
heh, it's in arch already - there is no way to export it into CVS *lalala* (-;
:-)
I read over "arch archive" and only saw "archive". Well, ok.
Erik, do we support arch? I remember we talked about it as a possibility, but I do not remember what was decided.
Well, I wouldn't call a linear algebra package "linear algebra", or an XML parser "xml", because they aren't what their name sugests. I would prefer something along the lines of "ubf.lisp", or "cl-ubf", "UBF-in-CL" etc.
ah, good one. I was thinking that it would fit in well together with rfc<nnnn> (cl implementations of the respective RFCs) and linedit (a line editing package) (-:
Which is a good argument against the rfc<nnnn> names. I think I just changed my mind on those rfc<nnnn> names; I don't think anymore that they are good names, because the projects aren't the rfc. Linedit is an invented word, afaict, so I'd think it is 100% ok.
cl-ubf will do, of course.
Ok.
I am an Austrian, living in Austria, and now that you mention it, I'm not so sure about the PD situation here, either. I'll change the licence to a BSD one (sans advertising clause), which should be OK.
Ok.
Then, as far as I am concerned, I think your project should get hosting here. The only thing that remains to be cleared is whether we support arch or not.
Regards, Mario.