4 Mar
2004
4 Mar
'04
1:01 p.m.
Project name: unetwork
Sounds very good! I approve. However, Have you considered using LLGPL instead of LGPL? http://opensource.franz.com/preamble.html LGPL is ok, but subject to interpretation when used with Lisp due to it's C-centric jargon. For example: is dumping a core static or dynamic linking? What about fasl-loading? Are new methods dispatching on the classes in the library work that uses the library, or work based on the library? Cheers, -- Nikodemus Siivola