>> Well, GPL seems to meet most of my requirements for licensing
>> issues, so I'll prefer using it.

>This means that you can't _use_ BSD code and distribute the result.
>
>>From section 2 of the GPL:
>-----
>b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in
>whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part
>thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties
>under the terms of this License.
>-----

>This means that you'll have to find a GPL'd compiler to target, and
>you'll only be able to use GPL'd libraries. The fact the lisp leaves
>you no option but to "link" directly to other code makes the GPL far
>more restrictive than it is for compile-edit-debug languages.