![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6ec6231e08b2934938c4704d91a8d301.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Nikodemus Siivola <tsiivola@cc.hut.fi> writes:
While on the topic: though I like the default of -devel, -help, and -announce, for most hosted projects this is actually a bit excessive: -devel would seem to be enough. As a result we host a huge number of stale lists, and while this is essentially "free" for us, it increases the likelyhood that someone interested in project foo will subscribe to a dead list and wonder where eveyone is...
Hence, I'd like to suggest that we from now on would by default generate only -devel list for new projects, unless they request more. Projects prior to 1.0 seldom need -help or -announce.
What do you think?
I think that your idea is good. But IIRC, we've had this discussion before, and the conclusion was that since the current policy minimizes the amount of administration, it is better. I wonder if better tools could add flexibility to this and keep the administration overhead almost as low. Regards, Mario.