4 Mar
2004
4 Mar
'04
1:11 p.m.
Selon Nikodemus Siivola <tsiivola@cc.hut.fi>:
Project name: unetwork
Sounds very good! I approve.
However, Have you considered using LLGPL instead of LGPL?
http://opensource.franz.com/preamble.html
LGPL is ok, but subject to interpretation when used with Lisp due to it's C-centric jargon. For example: is dumping a core static or dynamic linking? What about fasl-loading? Are new methods dispatching on the classes in the library work that uses the library, or work based on the library?
I agree. I'll change the license to LLGPL. Thanks, -- Matthieu Villeneuve