One of the admins suggested my SourceForge approach of splitting Cello off as a separate project made sense to him for common-lisp.net as well. It does make sense, since one can use Cells in non-GUI apps--I did so with my RoboCup client, whose only I/O is via sockets.
So I would like to formally request a separate Cello project on common-lisp.net.
kenny
Kenny Tilton ktilton@nyc.rr.com writes:
So I would like to formally request a separate Cello project on common-lisp.net.
I approve too. I was away for a few days without 'net access...
I think that if Kenny feels that a single project with subprojects cells, cello, and open-gl bindings will be more comfortable for him right now - well, I don't see a problem. If afterwards the needs change, we just take a look at things and think what we can do.
Regards, Mario.
Mario Mommer wrote:
Kenny Tilton ktilton@nyc.rr.com writes:
So I would like to formally request a separate Cello project on common-lisp.net.
I approve too. I was away for a few days without 'net access...
I think that if Kenny feels that a single project with subprojects cells, cello, and open-gl bindings will be more comfortable for him right now - well, I don't see a problem.
Thx, guys. I woke up this morning and remembered, hey, Cello, so far has been gotten to work only on win32 and only with LW and ACL (CLisp and CormanCL efforts came to nought, but might fly with more persistence; anyway..) so that's another black mark for Cello. I'd at least like to see one port to the land of Unice before beating my chest too loudly about Cello. And my ogl bindings are a private joke, I'll never brag about those. :)
The envelope, please.....Cello will be nothing but a zip available by FTP from the Cells project until/if there is a version working under X (SBCL, CMUCL, or OpenMCL). Then I will re-request a Cello project.
Thx for being supportive and ging me the options.
kenny
-
Kenny Tilton -
Mario Mommer -
Nikodemus Siivola