Hello, Some people would be interested in working on a library for image manipulation, based on some code Robert Strandh wrote a few years ago. We think it would be nice to have that project hosted on common-lisp.net. Here are the details: Project name: image Developer names: Robert Strandh Arnaud Rouanet Matthieu Villeneuve License: LGPL or LLGPL Description: image is a Common Lisp image manipulation library. Its goal is to allow handling images in various formats (grey, RGB, YUV, indexed, etc.), loading/saving using various file formats (PNM, PNG, etc.), and operations on images. Status: Data structures exist for most image formats. Loading/saving works for PNM formats. Thanks, -- Matthieu Villeneuve
matthieu.villeneuve@free.fr writes:
Hello,
Some people would be interested in working on a library for image manipulation, based on some code Robert Strandh wrote a few years ago. We think it would be nice to have that project hosted on common-lisp.net. Here are the details:
Developer names: Robert Strandh Arnaud Rouanet Matthieu Villeneuve
License: LGPL or LLGPL
Description: image is a Common Lisp image manipulation library. Its goal is to allow handling images in various formats (grey, RGB, YUV, indexed, etc.), loading/saving using various file formats (PNM, PNG, etc.), and operations on images.
Status: Data structures exist for most image formats. Loading/saving works for PNM formats.
Sounds very good! Approved, although...
Project name: image
...i would like to ask you to think about it again. "image" is perhaps too canonical as a name. After all, it is not an image, but a library to manipulate images. IMHO, anyway. Regards, Mario
Selon Mario Mommer <mommer@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>:
Approved, although...
Project name: image
...i would like to ask you to think about it again. "image" is perhaps too canonical as a name. After all, it is not an image, but a library to manipulate images.
IMHO, anyway.
Ok. I thought of the library as a kind of "canonical" one (hoping that it becomes a de facto standard for image manipulation, with lots of contributors and users), but that may seem too ambitious. I had a hard time thinking about an alternate name, Nikodemus suggested "imago" on #lisp, and I like it. Would that be valid? Thanks, -- Matthieu Villeneuve
participants (4)
-
Erik Enge -
Mario Mommer -
matthieu.villeneuve＠free.fr -
Nikodemus Siivola