Mario Mommer mommer@igpm.rwth-aachen.de writes:
Yes, I approve too, although I would sugest to choose a different name, simply because 'irc' is already the name of Internet Relay Chat. How obout clirc or something like that?
I agree with that sentiment when we are dealing with trademarked names but I don't think there would be any reason to do this in this instance. Would you also name an SMTP library clsmtp, or an http library clhttp?
I'd prefer it to be 'irc' but if there are more people agreeing with Mommer then I'm probably missing something and would be ok with a name change.
Erik.
Erik Enge eenge@prium.net writes:
Mario Mommer mommer@igpm.rwth-aachen.de writes:
Yes, I approve too, although I would sugest to choose a different name, simply because 'irc' is already the name of Internet Relay Chat. How obout clirc or something like that?
I agree with that sentiment when we are dealing with trademarked names but I don't think there would be any reason to do this in this instance. Would you also name an SMTP library clsmtp, or an http library clhttp?
I don't think I would name it SMTP, though, simply because it is not SMTP. Like you don't call a garage a car, or a stream a file. It would also be silly to call gtk bindings gtk, or to call CLX just X. Do you think 'UNIX' is a good name for a CL interface to UNIX?
I'd prefer it to be 'irc' but if there are more people agreeing with Mommer then I'm probably missing something and would be ok with a name change.
Hey, it was mostly a sugestion / observation. I don't think you'll have trouble with this, but IMO it is not a good name.
Regards, Mario.