Re: [alexandria-devel] curry and rcurry -> papply and rpapply?

Attila Lendvai wrote:

if people second the other opinion, then i feel that i must speak up on behalf of the non-abbreviation group.

the need for abbreviation (if any) should be satisfied by a tool (the editor), not a library.

Indeed, but it's also a matter of screen estate. Composition of three functions partially applied in reverse order might be a one-liner using RCURRY but a whopping three lines using REVERSE-PARTIAL-APPLY.

Anyway I feel this discussion is largely based on fancy. How about offering both interfaces?

Leslie