26 Jan
2013
26 Jan
'13
2:40 p.m.
On 23 July 2012 20:32, Faré <fahree@gmail.com> wrote:
An important missing information that parse-ordinary-lambda-list fails to return is whether there was a &key keyword. If I submit a patch to add that as an additional returned value, will it be integrated?
I've added support for this. Sorry about the abominable delay. Cheers, -- Nikodemus