![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5cd0acc03793e7944454dbb533bbfe43.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
22 Feb
2008
22 Feb
'08
5 p.m.
On 2/22/08, Attila Lendvai <attila.lendvai@gmail.com> wrote:
but to be specific about length=1:
Hah, I had forgotten we already had SEQUENCE-OF-LENGTH-P :) In that case my only objection to length=1 is the name, which is... not ugly per se, but introduces a new naming convention. No, I don't have any good alternatives to offer straightaway. :/ Cheers, -- Nikodemus