
14 Mar
2008
14 Mar
'08
2:47 p.m.
"Nikodemus Siivola" <nikodemus@random-state.net> writes:
Perhaps you might be better served with MAP-HASH-TABLE, which maps into a new hash-table? Something like this (untested), maybe:
I can see this being the better choice. I'll make the necessary changes. -T.