26 Jan
2013
26 Jan
'13
2:21 p.m.
On 2 August 2012 05:41, Pierre Thierry pierre@nothos.net wrote:
+(defmacro let@ (name bindings &body body)
- "LET@ is RnRS' LET.
I'm OK with a named-let in principle, I think. Maybe. But I'm dead-set against calling it let@.
Rename into something descriptive, add test-cases, add to documentation, and this can probably be merged.
(Most of the time when I see code written with named let I want to rewrite it into something more readable, but I'm willing to believe that it doesn't have to be always bad...)
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus