Re: [alexandria-devel] HASH-TABLE-NEXT worthwhile to have?

10 Jul 2007


      Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
...
Andreas Fuchs wrote:
...
Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
...
Samium Gromoff wrote:
...
Would it be worthwhile to have something like this:
(defun hash-table-next (hash-table)
What's the use-case?
I use something like this, named hash-table-contains-elements-p.
(defun hash-table-empty-p (hash-table)
   (zerop (hash-table-count hash-table)))
?
Oh, heh. Ooops. Yeah, that will do, too.

Thanks,
-- 
Andreas Fuchs, (http://|im:asf@|mailto:asf@)boinkor.net, antifuchs