4 Apr
2008
4 Apr
'08
9:25 p.m.
"Tobias C. Rittweiler" tcr@freebits.de writes:
"Nikodemus Siivola" nikodemus@random-state.net writes:
Perhaps you might be better served with MAP-HASH-TABLE, which maps into a new hash-table? Something like this (untested), maybe:
I can see this being the better choice. I'll make the necessary changes.
This can finally be pulled from