11 May
2015
11 May
'15
2:53 p.m.
Scribit salvador fandino dies 11/05/2015 hora 16:00:
Considering those results I would choose 200 as the best cut point because it is where SBCL and CCL perform best without incurring in a great penalty for ECL and GCL (~40%). Note also that performance degrades quite fast for SBCL and CCL once the optimal cut point is surpassed.
Why not use a different cut point for implementations where we know an optimal one?
Curiously, Pierre Thierry
--
pierre@nothos.net
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A