June 2006 - announcements - mailman3.common-lisp.net

[ann] [flexi-streams-announce] New version 0.5.7
by Edi Weitz 29 Jun '06

29 Jun '06

ChangeLog: Version 0.5.7 2006-06-29 Removed incompatibility with AllegroCL, see mailing list archive for details Download: http://weitz.de/files/flexi-streams.tar.gz _______________________________________________ flexi-streams-announce mailing list flexi-streams-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/flexi-streams-announce

1 0

[ann] [flexi-streams-announce] New version 0.5.6
by Edi Weitz 12 Jun '06

12 Jun '06

ChangeLog: Version 0.5.6 2006-06-13 Fix Emacs mode lines (reported by Robert Goldman) Download: http://weitz.de/files/flexi-streams.tar.gz _______________________________________________ flexi-streams-announce mailing list flexi-streams-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/flexi-streams-announce

1 0

[ann] [rdnzl-announce] New version 0.10.0 (ECL support)
by Edi Weitz 12 Jun '06

12 Jun '06

ChangeLog: Version 0.10.0 2006-06-12 ECL port (provided by Michael Goffioul) Download: http://weitz.de/files/RDNZL.tar.gz _______________________________________________ rdnzl-announce mailing list rdnzl-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rdnzl-announce

1 0

[ann] [cl-muproc-announce] New version of cl-muproc (was: Reorg of impl-dep functions)
by Klaus Harbo 08 Jun '06

08 Jun '06

Rudi Schlatte wrote: > Hmm, muproc-compat.lisp (in your proposal below) would be essentially documentation, and would only be loaded on otherwise unsupported Lisp implementations. In that light, would it make sense to create muproc-compat.txt (or porting.txt) and document the muproc-compat interface there? Alternatively, the documentation could also be written as comments in the :exports section of the defpackage form for the cl-muproc.compat package. There's a new version of cl-muproc incorporating Rudi's new with a few modifcations... I decided that with implementation specific files, muproc-compat.lisp did not make much sense. I think the package definition for cl-muproc.compat defines the required implementation specific functionality adequately, and decided to add a PORTING file briefly describing the intended structure of implementation specific code instead. The new version compiles without warnings and passes the test on Lispworks. Enjoy. -Klaus. _______________________________________________ cl-muproc-announce mailing list cl-muproc-announce(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-muproc-announce

1 0