armedbear-devel

armedbear-devel@common-lisp.net

1 participants
1200 discussions

[Armedbear-devel] [CfP] International Lisp Conference 2014, Aug. 14-17, Montreal
by Didier Verna 07 May '14

07 May '14

ILC 2014 - International Lisp Conference "Lisp on the Move" August 14-17 2014, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada Sponsored by the Association of Lisp Users In cooperation with: ACM SIGPLAN http://www.international-lisp-conference.org Scope: Lisp is one of the greatest ideas from computer science and a major influence for almost all programming languages and for all sufficiently complex software applications. The International Lisp Conference is a forum for the discussion of Lisp and, in particular, the design, implementation and application of any of the Lisp dialects. We encourage everyone interested in Lisp to participate. We invite high quality submissions in all areas involving Lisp dialects and any other languages in the Lisp family, including, but not limited to, ACL2, AutoLisp, Clojure, Common Lisp, ECMAScript, Dylan, Emacs Lisp, ISLISP, Racket, Scheme, SKILL, HOP etc. The conference proceedings will be published in the ACM Digital Library. This year's focus will be directed towards integrated solutions, including mobile computing. We especially invite submissions in the following areas: * Pervasive computing Interoperability Portability Implementation * challenges/tradeoffs for embedded/mobile platforms Language * support for mobile toolkits and frameworks Language support for * distribution Language support for reliability, availability, and * serviceability Mobile IDEs Mobile applications Contributions are also welcome in other areas, including but not limited to: * Language design and implementation Language integration, * inter-operation and deployment Applications (especially * commercial) Reflection, meta-object protocols, meta-programming * Domain-specific languages Programming paradigms and environments * Efficient parallel and concurrent computation Language support for * managing both manual and automatic GC Theorem proving Scientific * computing Data mining Semantic web Technical Programme: Original submissions in all areas related to the conference themes are invited for the following categories: Papers: Technical papers of up to 10 pages that describe original results. Demonstrations: Abstracts of up to 2 pages for demonstrations of tools, libraries and applications. Workshops: Abstracts of up to 2 pages for groups of people who intend to work on a focused topic for half a day. Tutorials: Abstracts of up to 2 pages for in-depth presentations about topics of special interest for 1 to 2 hours. Panel discussions: Abstracts of up to 2 pages for discussions about current themes. Panel discussion proposals must mention panel member who are willing to partake in a discussion. The conference will also provide slots for lightning talks, to be registered on-site every day. For inquiries about any other kind of participation (commercial exhibits, advertising, prizes, book signing etc.), please see the contacts below. Important Dates: - May 18, 2014: Submission deadline - June 09, 2014: Notification of acceptance - June 29, 2014: Final Papers due - August 14, 2014: Conference All submissions should be formatted following the ACM SIGS guidelines and include ACM classification categories and terms. For more information on the submission guidelines and the ACM keywords, see: http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates and http://www.acm.org/about/class/1998. Submissions should be uploaded to Easy Chair, at the following address: https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=ilc14 Organizing Committee: General Chair: Marc Feeley (Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada) Programme Chair: Didier Verna (EPITA Research lab, Paris, France) Local chair: Marc Feeley (Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada) Programme Committee: Charlotte Herzeel, IMEC, ExaScience Life Lab, Belgium Damir Cavar, Eastern Michigan University, USA Dave Herman, Mozilla Research, USA Greg Pfeil, Clozure Associates, USA Irène Anne Durand, LaBRI University of Bordeaux, France Jim Newton, Cadence Design Systems, France Kuroda Hisao, Mathematical Systems Inc., Japan Matthew Might, University of Utah, USA Nicolas Neuss, Friedrich Alexander Universitat, Germany Ralf Möller, TUHH, Germany Sam Tobin-Hochstadt, Northeastern University, USA William Byrd, University of Utah, USA Contacts: * General Questions: ilc14-organizing-committee at alu.org * Programme Committee: ilc14 at easychair.org For more information, see http://www.international-lisp-conference.org -- Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated. Lisp, Jazz, Aïkido: http://www.didierverna.info _______________________________________________ Armedbear-devel mailing list Armedbear-devel(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel

1 0

[Armedbear-devel] symbol-macrolet + nth-value
by James M. Lawrence 07 May '14

07 May '14

Hello, (defun foo () (symbol-macrolet ((x 3)) (symbol-macrolet ((y (nth-value 0 x))) y))) Compiling this with COMPILE (C-c-c in slime) warns about X being undefined, and an unbound X error occurs when FOO is run. (macroexpand-1 '(defun foo () (symbol-macrolet ((x 3)) (symbol-macrolet ((y (nth-value 0 x))) y)))) ;;=> (PROG1 (SYSTEM:%DEFUN 'FOO (SYSTEM:NAMED-LAMBDA FOO NIL (BLOCK FOO (LOCALLY (LOCALLY (NTH-VALUE 0 X))))))) X didn't get expanded. There is no problem when compiling the DEFUN form with COMPILE-FILE (C-c-k). _______________________________________________ Armedbear-devel mailing list Armedbear-devel(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel

1 0

[Asdf-devel] ASDF 3.1.2 released
by Robert P. Goldman 06 May '14

06 May '14

The release version of ASDF 3.1, version 3.1.2, has finally arrived. It is loaded with bug-fixes, more portability (substantially better support on Windows; several new lisp implementations), better documentation (extensive revisions to the Texinfo manual), and new convenience features such as PACKAGE-INFERRED-SYSTEMs. We urge the maintainers of lisp implementations to move to version 3.1.2 directly, as it is clearly superior to its predecessors. This is especially true if you are currently bundling a pre-release version of ASDF. For a list of changes, see the attached changelog. Special thanks to Dave Cooper and Anton Vodonosov (alphabetically) for testing support. Thanks to all those who have participated in the discussions on ASDF-devel for bug fixes, suggestions, and course corrections. Thanks to Pete Keller for proofreading this announcement; any remaining errors are mine alone. Although he is no longer the lead maintainer, François-René Rideau (Fare), has continued to expend vast amounts of effort on ASDF, and provided invaluable guidance to the code submitted by the rest of us. The latest version of ASDF is available at the project website: http://common-lisp.net/project/asdf/ Robert P. Goldman ASDF maintainer-in-chief _______________________________________________ Asdf-devel mailing list Asdf-devel(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel

1 0

[Armedbear-devel] ABCL 1.3.1 testgrid results - no regressions
by Anton Vodonosov 01 May '14

01 May '14

Hi, I have tested ABCL 1.3.1, no regressions comparing to 1.3.0 and 1.2.1: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/abcl/abcl-diff23.html http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/abcl/abcl-diff24.html _______________________________________________ Armedbear-devel mailing list Armedbear-devel(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel

1 0

[Armedbear-devel] Fixing #352 / JSS fails to introspect foo(long) methods
by olof＠macrolet.net 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

Hi, I've been trying to improve my idea in [1]. Attached is a slightly different patch, still with the same general idea though. I've added two tests, however I'd still like to do a bit more than that, especially testing the correct resolution of methods, i.e. Java::isMoreSpecialized. My current understanding is that with this patch all possible methods (like for the attached class DummyMethods) are found, but that isMoreSpecialized doesn't actually do what its name implies, namely finding the most specialized method. That is, I'm assuming that JCALL is supposed to use the (exact) same kind of method resolution as Java (if no method signature is given)? Additionally I actually wanted to add DummyMethods for testing from java-tests.lisp, but didn't work out for now. Best regards, Olof [1]: http://abcl.org/trac/ticket/352 _______________________________________________ Armedbear-devel mailing list Armedbear-devel(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel

2 2

[Armedbear-devel] PROBE-DIRECTORY borks on wildcard character
by Faré 15 Apr '14

15 Apr '14

EXTENSIONS:PROBE-DIRECTORY fails when the directory name has wildcard characters See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/asdf/+bug/1307571 —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Meta is Better. Anything you can do, I can do Meta. — Patrick Logan _______________________________________________ Armedbear-devel mailing list Armedbear-devel(a)common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel

2 1

[armedbear-devel] ASDF-JAR vs ASDF3 deployment support
by Erik Huelsmann 04 Apr '13

04 Apr '13

Hi all, Some years ago, Mark wrote ASDF-JAR; a solution to package ASDF systems and their dependencies in JARs. As it turns out, the solution chosen has some problems with correctly packaging ASDs for systems which use the #. reader macro. As an example: bordeaux-threads uses a version.lisp-sexp file to canonically define the version number and the system definition reads that file in a #. form. However, this file isn't packaged because it's not part of the file listing in the system definition. This means asdf can't load the definition after deployment. With the advent of ASDF3, its developers have created infrastructure to combine fasls of a single system and even fasls of a system and all its dependencies into a single large combined FASL. Among others, this new infrastructure does not run into the issue ASDF-JAR is running into. While not completely equivalent to the JAR solution, using this infrastructure would help us a huge step along that way of getting better deployment. My current thinking is that if the single-packed-FASL needs to end up as a jar, we can work on that as a next step. The first step to take would be to create "concatenate fasls" functionality, which would do the following: * Detect all the file entries in all the passed-in fasls * Create a new output zip file with directories for each fasl being packed, populated with the files and directories of that fasl * create a toplevel ._ file which loads the sub-fasls' ._ files Comments? Bye, Erik.

5 8

[armedbear-devel] REMOVE CACHES: r14460 changes FASL entry point name
by Erik Huelsmann 03 Apr '13

03 Apr '13

Hi all, Commits between r14456 and r14460 change the FASL entry point name. Everybody tracking trunk will need to blow their caches away. Bye, Erik.

1 0

[armedbear-devel] Patch for ASDF2.26.32 to support concatenated fasls for ABCL
by Erik Huelsmann 03 Apr '13

03 Apr '13

Hi! In order for these commands to generate a fasl per ASDF system, I had to apply the patch below to ASDF. $ ./abcl CL-USER(1): :ld c:/users/erik/quicklisp/setup CL-USER(2): (ql:quickload :bordeaux-threads) CL-USER(3): (asdf:oos 'asdf:binary-op :bordeax-threads) The commands above work with current trunk (r14460) and produces 2 concatenated fasls in my cache directory: 1 for alexandria and 1 for bordeaux-threads. This patch is required (also attached, to prevent line wrapping): diff --git a/bundle.lisp b/bundle.lisp index 568f894..24fbf90 100644 --- a/bundle.lisp +++ b/bundle.lisp @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ (or #+ecl (or (equalp type (compile-file-type :type :object)) (equalp type (compile-file-type :type :static-library))) #+mkcl (equalp type (compile-file-type :fasl-p nil)) - #+(or allegro clisp clozure cmu lispworks sbcl scl xcl) (equalp type (compile-file-type))))) + #+(or abcl allegro clisp clozure cmu lispworks sbcl scl xcl) (equalp type (compile-file-type))))) (defgeneric* (trivial-system-p) (component)) diff --git a/uiop/lisp-build.lisp b/uiop/lisp-build.lisp index e2e376d..4b7e819 100644 --- a/uiop/lisp-build.lisp +++ b/uiop/lisp-build.lisp @@ -669,11 +669,12 @@ it will filter them appropriately." ;;; Links FASLs together (with-upgradability () (defun combine-fasls (inputs output) - #-(or allegro clisp clozure cmu lispworks sbcl scl xcl) + #-(or abcl allegro clisp clozure cmu lispworks sbcl scl xcl) (error "~A does not support ~S~%inputs ~S~%output ~S" (implementation-type) 'combine-fasls inputs output) #+clozure (ccl:fasl-concatenate output inputs :if-exists :supersede) #+(or allegro clisp cmu sbcl scl xcl) (concatenate-files inputs output) + #+abcl (sys:concatenate-fasls inputs output) #+lispworks (let (fasls) (unwind-protect

1 0

[armedbear-devel] Support for concatenated fasls
by Erik Huelsmann 03 Apr '13

03 Apr '13

Hi! As we discussed, I'd write FASL concatenation support for ABCL. I'm nearly done, however I'm running into a snag caused by ASDF: Normally, a file "package.lisp" is compiled into a fasl "package.abcl" which is basically a zip with at least one entry: "package._". The "._" file contains instructions for loading the fasl and may contain references to other files in the same zip. My FASL concatenation code currently uses the assumption that the "._" file has exactly the same name as the enclosing package. However, FASLs generated using ASDF violate that assumption: the ._ file in the fasl isn't called "package._" but it's called "package-ASDF_TMP._". How does ABCL know about the suffix when ASDF is loading the FASL "package.abcl" with the suffixed file in it in the regular situation? Bye, Erik.

2 2

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

armedbear-devel