On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Erik Huelsmann ehuels@gmail.com wrote:
Ticket 79 is one of the "correctness" category: we do something which we shouldn't (although it hasn't been seen in real life yet). When we compile a file containing 2 *different* -yet similarly named - uninterned symbols, they are coalesced into the same object when reading that fasl.
Proposed change committed in r12650. Ticket #79 is now fixed!
Code changes were a little bit more involved than I had planned, but *fasl-anonymous-package* was used in more places than I expected.
As a consequence of this change, I have increased the FASL version number.
Bye,
Erik.