On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Mark Evenson evenson@panix.com wrote:
On 5/9/10 9:10 AM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
Here's the proposed change to asdf.lisp
Adds fasl version to the implementation string, and java-1.4 - java-1.7 to the architecture features.
This gives (asdf::implementation-identifier) -> "armedbear-0.20.0-dev-fasl36-darwin-java-1.5"
[…]
Added as [r12664][1].
SLIME does something similar, for which the "unknown" bit for platform always bothered me. Using the the Java version used for compilation makes some amount of sense, even though the FASLs should be identical for all versions of Java, as it's our native compiler doing the bit twiddling.
The fasls might have references to java classes that are different for java 1.5 than 1.6.
-Alan (who has some influence on what bits are twiddled too)
I should probably change SLIME as well.
-- "A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare to it now."
armedbear-devel mailing list armedbear-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel