![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9e2504e0b74e5384af09ce8a660afac4.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
8 Apr
2015
8 Apr
'15
8:57 p.m.
Faré <fahree@gmail.com> writes:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Pascal J. Bourguignon <pjb@informatimago.com> wrote:
[…] so one could argue that there's no rule for `#n(…), and therefore it's not a conforming form anyways.
If #n(…) is collapsed to #(…) then the abcl result is correct, as per the above rule.
Maybe it should be an error, then, or demons should be made to fly out of one's nose.
I would rather have a CDR written to specify this case ;-) -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ "Le mercure monte ? C'est le moment d'acheter !"