I don't think the package is the culprit. Your package most probably USEs the CL package, or many other things would not work as you'd expect.
Answering your earlier question, the correct way would be (setf *debugger-hook* ...) rather than defparameter, or even better binding instead of assigning - (let ((*debugger-hook* ...)) (do-your-stuff)).
But I don't think that can make a difference between working and not working at all. It is more of a question of good style. Perhaps you're not considering thread-local bindings? If you run your defparameter/setf form on one thread, but .eval is called on another thread (and with a GUI involved, that is very probable), then chances are that the code in your .eval call is running in a dynamic environment where *debugger-hook* is locally rebound, and thus the global binding that you modify with defparameter/setf is shadowed. You can detect it by printing the value of *debugger-hook* in an .eval call triggered by the GUI. If that is the case, you should make sure to assign a new value to *debugger-hook* on the right thread, or, better, to use (let ...) as shown above. Let me stress that using LET is usually what you want in Lisp, especially when dealing with dynamic variables; a good rule of thumb is: avoid SETF and friends (defparameter is a friend) unless you're working on local variables. Of course, experts know when and how to break the rules :D but if you're a beginner, sticking to that style will make things easier to understand and debug, once you enter the right mindset.
hth, Alessio
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Jonathan Fischer Friberg odyssomay@gmail.com wrote:
It might be that I'm in the wrong package. Although the repl is in cl-user, and even if I change to that package the code in the previous mail has no effect.
Jonathan
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Jonathan Fischer Friberg odyssomay@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if this is the correct way to do it, but I did:
(defparameter *debugger-hook* #'sys::%debugger-hook-function)
In the repl (from running java -jar abcl.jar), this worked as expected. However, I can't seem to get it working with the .eval function of my interpreter instance.
Jonathan
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Alessio Stalla alessiostalla@gmail.com wrote:
Short story: if you call into Lisp using the JSR-223 API, conditions are automatically rethrown as Java exceptions.
Long story: the way this is implemented is by binding *debugger-hook* to an internal, probably undocumented function, that already does what you want. It is called sys::%debugger-hook-function.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Jonathan Fischer Friberg odyssomay@gmail.com wrote:
I should add that a solution from inside CL would also work. I'm using the ABCL eval to execute all code, so maybe I could wrap the call with something like this:
(handler-case (... do-stuff ...) (... catch CL-condition + throw java exception ...))
I don't know if that would work. Also, my CL skills are not good enough to finish the code above (how do I capture all conditions?), so help would be appreciated.
Jonathan
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Jonathan Fischer Friberg odyssomay@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again, :)
I'm currently running CL-code from java. The gui is completely implemented on the java side. It would be nice if all errors occuring inside abcl could be captured from the java side (to be displayed in the gui as an error). Is that possible?
Jonathan
armedbear-devel mailing list armedbear-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel
-- Some gratuitous spam:
http://ripple-project.org Ripple, social credit system http://villages.cc Villages.cc, Ripple-powered community economy http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear ABCL, Common Lisp on the JVM http://code.google.com/p/tapulli my current open source projects http://www.manydesigns.com/ ManyDesigns Portofino, open source model-driven Java web application framework