On 1/3/17 20:46, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Mark Evenson <evenson@panix.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 1/3/17 00:35, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>>> Well, I've gone and made an attempt at a "less leaky" version. (It
>> became
>>> an obsession :( )
>>
>>
>> Very cool. I need to find some cycles to start working through your code.
>>
>> One question: do you expect version of SLIME categorically fail
>> completely with previous ABCL versions (i.e. those without
>> ABCL-INTROSPECT)? Or were your able to special-case the new features in
>> swank-abcl.lisp?
[…]
> But is it worth it, given that it will require the new version of ABCL for
> source-location?
I will incur significant "support" cost if SLIME stops working for
existing users, so I need to avoid that scenario if at all possible.