On 11 May 2010 19:34, Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen@gmail.com wrote:
How about this patch? I'll run the interpreted tests for it shortly, but I guess it makes sense?
The interpreted ansi-tests pass without regressions, and the example snippet now errs out with "&REST/&BODY must precede &KEY."
I'm not exactly thrilled about the argument processing code, and I bet many people would agree. Rewriting that stuff is another matter and I'm not going to delve into that right now.
If you have huge objections to the patch, holler.