11 May
2010
11 May
'10
4:49 p.m.
On 11 May 2010 19:34, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@gmail.com> wrote:
How about this patch? I'll run the interpreted tests for it shortly, but I guess it makes sense?
The interpreted ansi-tests pass without regressions, and the example snippet now errs out with "&REST/&BODY must precede &KEY." I'm not exactly thrilled about the argument processing code, and I bet many people would agree. Rewriting that stuff is another matter and I'm not going to delve into that right now. If you have huge objections to the patch, holler.