On 21 Aug 2014, at 01:55, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov@yandex.ru> wrote:
What version of cl+ssl do you test?
On 2014-07-19 a pull request was merged int cl+ssl. According to the author, https works OK (mostly) for him. https://github.com/cl-plus-ssl/cl-plus-ssl/pull/5
As Anton notes in the followup, the author of CL+SSL pull request #5 was Olof. After visual inspection of CL+SSL #5, it seems that Olof might be relying [on the one patch that didn’t make it as part of my CFFI pull request][1], as it wasn’t readily apparent to me how to merge. This message constitutes a “HEADS UP” to remind myself (and possibly others) to cross-check what exactly the behaviour of CFFI #43 is with CL-SSL #5, and to revise CFFI #43 if necessary. [1]: https://github.com/easye/cffi/commit/36012f655372217133b2a83fb3008380724cb37... -- "A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before but there is nothing to compare to it now." _______________________________________________ Armedbear-devel mailing list Armedbear-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel