Re: [armedbear-devel] EXT:URL-PATHNAME vs http: as a logical pathname

On Aug 14, 2013, at 0056 , Mark Evenson evenson@panix.com wrote:

[] URL-PATHNAME objects are actually supposed to be strictly defined as a [URI][1], which we can distinguish by having a "/" immediately after the ":" so I think we are in good shape to implement this in a sane manner that covers all possible cases, not those just with "http" and "https" schemas.

err "schemes" not "schemas".

-- "A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before but there is nothing to compare to it now."