Excellent. Is there a simple way to test the version from within ABCL? Is the primary value of (lisp-implementation-version) always going to follow the ASDF convention of having only digits and dots? Also, I didn't see anything in your patch regarding COMPILE-FILE; was it already good to go with respect to external formats? —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org If it's not worth doing right, it's not worth doing. — Scott McKay On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Mark Evenson <evenson@panix.com> wrote:
On 2/26/13 0825 , Mark Evenson wrote:
On 2/25/13 10:28 PM, Faré wrote:
Dear ABCL developers,
it looks like ABCL is not doing the Right Thing with respect to LOAD's :EXTERNAL-FORMAT argument, instead reading everything with some dubious default from the environment. Can you fix it?
[…]
With [r14402][], the version of asdf-encodings.script from asdf-2.30 with the #+abcl conditional commented out now passes.
[r14402]: http://trac.common-lisp.net/armedbear/changeset/14402
-- "A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare to it now."