> On Apr 18, 2014, at 3:12, Cyrus Harmon <ch-lisp@bobobeach.com> wrote:Tests finished (svn revision 14688), all good:
>> Olof circulated a fix for this earlier today. Can we get this into the tree?
> Certainly: applied as [r14687][], and backported to the [abcl-1.3.1 branch][1.3.1].
>
> [r14687]: http://abcl.org/trac/changeset/14687
> [1.3.1]: http://abcl.org/svn/branches/1.3.1
http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/abcl/abcl-diff21.html
http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/abcl/abcl-diff22.html
The only suspicious bug is cl-containers in the second report.
But I guess it's not a regressions, the problem happens on the
previous ABCL versions too.
I tested it manually on ABCL 1.2.1, 1.3.0 and 1.3.1-rc.
When you quickload cl-containers first time, it compiles OK.
When you quickload it second time, it fails with the error
"no class named ABSTRACT-CONTAINER".
The difference in test results may be caused by different
build order of quicklisp libraries when testing on ABCL 1.3.0 and 1.3.1-rc,
because some libraries and their dependencies fail on one ABCL
but succeed on another.
Best regards,
- Anton
_______________________________________________
Armedbear-devel mailing list
Armedbear-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel