Re: [armedbear-devel] [PATCH] Support for SYNCHRONIZED blocks (and company)

The patch...

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Erik Huelsmannehuels@gmail.com wrote:

Based on discussion earlier this week, I'd like the following patch to get committed to our trunk.

It introduces a new block statement

SYNCHRONIZED-ON <object>    body

and next to that a number of functions:

object-wait <object> &optional timeout  object-notify <object>  object-notify-all <object>

So, what's the verdict?

Anyway, I plan on including some simple test cases, but ofcourse, if someone feels like doing so, please feel free!

Bye,

Erik.