On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Mark Evenson <evenson@panix.com> wrote:

On 1/3/17 00:35, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
> Well, I've gone and made an attempt at a "less leaky" version. (It became
> an obsession :( )

Very cool. I need to find some cycles to start working through your code.

One question: do you expect version of SLIME categorically fail
completely with previous ABCL versions (i.e. those without
ABCL-INTROSPECT)? Or were your able to special-case the new features in
swank-abcl.lisp?

I did a bit of special-casing, but for the new stacktrace - falls back to the old version if it isn't there (though current version (require)s abcl-introspect).

No special-casing for new record-source-location stuff.

I could see about making it work without abcl-introspect. IIRC there are only a couple of places that use it.

But is it worth it, given that it will require the new version of ABCL for source-location?

Alan

btw, haven't updated https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/abcl/ -will do later

--
"A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before, but there
is nothing to compare to it now."