On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:34 AM, dmiles@users.sourceforge.net logicmoo@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Alessio Stalla alessiostalla@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Alan Ruttenberg alanruttenberg@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 16, 2010, at 8:47 AM, dmiles@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
The java lisp I work on has bignum types that get demoted and promoted as needed.
So, this begs the question: What is the difference between your lisp and ABCL? Is your lisp ready for consumption? Does it make sense to combine efforts?
I'm intrigued as I see it's associated with LarKC, and mostly I use ABCL for projects related to ontology and semweb.
-Alan
SubLFixnum -> int SubLLongBignum -> long SubLBigIntBignum -> BigInteger
The code is at http://larkc.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/larkc/branches/LarKC_CommonLisp_Exte...
-Alan
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Alan Ruttenberg alanruttenberg@gmail.com wrote:
Am I right to observe that abcl coerces any number > fixnum size to bigint? I'm having trouble calling a java method that takes a long. I seem to have worked around it calling the method with (new 'long "9223372036854775807") rather than 9223372036854775807 .
Is this the desired behavior?
-Alan
armedbear-devel mailing list armedbear-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel
armedbear-devel mailing list armedbear-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel