22 Sep
2009
22 Sep
'09
5:30 a.m.
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:48:57 -0700 don-sourceforge-xxz@isis.cs3-inc.com (Don Cohen) wrote:
Alessio Stalla writes:
Let's start by describing how abcl works now. Every piece of code in the JVM needs to be contained in a method of some class, so when abcl compiles a function it produces - surprise - a class, or better, a stream of bytes that the JVM knows how to interpret to create a class.
This already seem counterintuitive to me.
If you are compiling code to the JVM where would the code go but in a method? If you are defining a method, where would you put it but in a class.
Matt
--
"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to
your grandmother." -- Albert Einstein.