23 May
2011
23 May
'11
4:29 p.m.
On 23 May 2011 18:49, Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 May 2011 18:47, Mark Evenson evenson@panix.com wrote:
Bug reproduced, but hmmm… The "obvious" solution via the attached patch causes our DEFPACKAGE form to go crazy, so this is going to take a bit more of study.
Oh? Damn, we need to coordinate. :P I put the same patch in, how did you notice the defpackage craziness?
Ok, reverted. There's bad quicklisp breakage, although it doesn't seem to be exactly defpackage-related.
Erik, I'm no longer subscribed on our commits list, for some reason...