![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9e2504e0b74e5384af09ce8a660afac4.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
22 Nov
2010
22 Nov
'10
10:55 a.m.
Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Mark Evenson <evenson@panix.com> wrote:
On 11/21/10 3:42 AM, Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
Here is a patch to allow ecl compile abcl (it fails however).
I also had problems with ZEROP stumbling on NIL, so I rather brutishly replaced most of its occurences with EQUAL 0. run-shell-command will need some work...
CLHS specifies that the argument to ZEROP is a number. SBCL also barks on the form (ZEROP nil).
On the other hand, do you have any reason to prefer (EQUAL 0 ..) over (EQL 0 ...)?
Indeed, (EQL 0 ...) is perfectly good. -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.