1 Jan
2011
1 Jan
'11
9:22 p.m.
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 January 2011 02:42, Erik Huelsmann ehuels@gmail.com wrote:
The solution - which is in my proposal - is to stop rewriting code in pass1, but address the true issue in pass2, where the actual issue can accurately be detected.
That sounds like a post-0.24 job, we should probably fix the current stack inconsistencies reported in whatever way we can and do this structural work for 0.25.
Ok. Well, ticket #117 is fixed at a slight performance cost in the compiler. But the fix was extremely simple, that's the advantage: there's hardly any chance for regressions.
Bye,
Erik.