On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Alessio Stalla <alessiostalla@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Blake McBride <blake@mcbride.name> wrote:
> Wow, I get some really weird stuff testing this with the latest trunk as
> follows. (I put his code in a file named yyy.lisp. I did not compile it.
> There is no yyy.fasl)
>
> Blake-Mac-17:tmp blake$ abcl
> Armed Bear Common Lisp 1.1.0-dev-svn-14015
> Java 1.6.0_33 Apple Inc.
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
> Low-level initialization completed in 0.369 seconds.
> Startup completed in 1.371 seconds.
> Type ":help" for a list of available commands.
> CL-USER(1): (load "yyy.lisp")
> T
> CL-USER(2): (foo-bar-rb)
> (foo-bar '(foo))
>
> Maximum error depth exceeded (11 nested errors) with 'FASL version mismatch;
> found '57' but expected '39' in with-standard-io-syntax'.
> CL-USER(3):
>
> I don't get the whole FASL stuff.

To me it smells like the file with the definition of
with-standard-io-syntax is autoloaded with *read-base* set to 16; in
fact, #x39 = 57.

With-standard-io-syntax is used when loading a FASL exactly to prevent
this kind of bugs, so probably it should be preloaded at startup to
solve the chicken-and-egg problem.

Alessio

> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Alessio Stalla <alessiostalla@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Durward McDonell
>> <durward.mcdonell@jhuapl.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello.
>> >
>> > I believe I have found a bug in FASL loading, with respect
>> > to *read-base* being reset. At least, I get the behavior I
>> > expect in sbcl, and not in abcl.
>> >
>> > Consider the following code:
>> >
>> > (defmacro foo-bar (s)
>> > `(sublis '((foo . bar)) ,s))
>> >
>> > (defun foo-bar-rb ()
>> > (let ((*read-base* #x10)
>> > (it (read)))
>> > (eval it)))
>> >
>> > Load this code, then execute (foo-bar-rb).
>> > It will wait for input. Type (foo-bar '(foo)).
>> > I would expect this to evaluate to (bar), but
>> > abcl gives a FASL version mismatch, where it
>> > seems that it is reading the FASL in the new
>> > base (16 instead of 10), and reports "found '56'
>> > but expected '38' in sublis".
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> What FASL are you speaking of? There is nothing explicitly loading one
>> in your code. Is this related to autoloading?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Alessio
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> armedbear-devel mailing list
>> armedbear-devel@common-lisp.net
>> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel
>
>

--
Some gratuitous spam:

http://ripple-project.org Ripple, social credit system
http://villages.cc Villages.cc, Ripple-powered community economy
http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear ABCL, Common Lisp on the JVM
http://code.google.com/p/tapulli my current open source projects
http://www.manydesigns.com/ ManyDesigns Portofino, open source
model-driven Java web application framework