26 Mar
2010
26 Mar
'10
12:58 p.m.
On 26 March 2010 13:29, Mark Evenson <evenson@panix.com> wrote:
In that case it would be good to be compatible with their scheme<sic>. Unless there's some problem with that.
Rebuttal pruned. :) Mark, that was.. ..very convincing. ;) If cl4java has that many problems, we don't want to be compatible.