4 Apr
2010
4 Apr
'10
3:39 p.m.
On 4 April 2010 15:04, Erik Huelsmann ehuels@gmail.com wrote:
I think now that the tests are correct, but that the requirement in the CLHS is out-dated. However, that's something to address in the implementation itself. I'll discuss on the ABCL list.
I would suggest that it is better to provide
EXT:UNICODE-UPCASE
or similar, instead of making standard functions behave in a manner not consistent with the spec.
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus