09.04.2015, 23:50, "Erik Huelsmann" <ehuels@gmail.com>:
http://abcl.org/trac/changeset/14756 fixes the cl-cont problems. After providing enough PermGen memory, I got the other failures to complete correctly (including stmx, btw) now too.
Could you run the tests again to see if *now* there are new successes? (I'm still expecting new successes, but I can't remember which systems were failing that were reporting eliminated dead code in LABELS.)
Regards,
Erik.
Hello, Here is the report: https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/abcl/abcl-diff26.html (BTW, the it was run on new quicklisp 2015-04-07) The only remaining regression is stmx - I suppose caused by http://abcl.org/trac/ticket/388 as Massimiliano reports. Erik, this error happens even with large PermGen space - it happens during tests, not during ql:quickload. You may reproduce with (asdf:test-op :stmx). The situation with iolib-tests is an improvement. Previous ABCL 1.3.1 catches raw java error: #<THREAD "interpreter" {1F10B9C}>: Debugger invoked on condition of type ERROR Caught java.nio.charset.UnsupportedCharsetException: LATIN-1. Restarts: 0: TOP-LEVEL Return to top level. while new ABCL wraps the java error into a lisp condition: Error loading /home/testgrid/.cache/common-lisp/abcl-1.4.0-dev-svn-14756-fasl42-linux-x86/home/testgrid/quicklisp/dists/quicklisp/software/iolib-20150302-git/tests/sockets.abcl at line 9 (offset 542) #<THREAD "interpreter" {C5B62D}>: Debugger invoked on condition of type SIMPLE-ERROR Undefined encoding: LATIN-1 Restarts: 0: TRY-RECOMPILING Recompile sockets and try loading it again 1: RETRY Retry loading FASL for #<ASDF/LISP-ACTION:CL-SOURCE-FILE "iolib/tests" "sockets">. 2: ACCEPT Continue, treating loading FASL for #<ASDF/LISP-ACTION:CL-SOURCE-FILE "iolib/tests" "sockets"> as having been successful. 3: RETRY Retry ASDF operation. 4: CLEAR-CONFIGURATION-AND-RETRY Retry ASDF operation after resetting the configuration. 5: ABORT Give up on "iolib-tests" 6: TOP-LEVEL Return to top level. Erik, probably the iolib-tests and hyperluminal-mem improvements are not what you expected from the dead code elimination fix. Let me know if any new tests are necessary. Best regards, - Anton