Re: [armedbear-devel] [PATCH] jcall(there are multiple matchingmethods)

Alan Ruttenberg writes:

This would be incompatible with other common lisps, and make porting to other java enabled lisps in the future a pain. My gut says don't mess with the define reading behavior.

I can't follow that line of logic; which other java-enabled Lisps of the future are you talking of?

Why should ABCL care for java-enabled Lisps of the future? It should become the java-enabled Lisp of the future: i.e. ABCL should strive to become a hallmark for java integration.

-T.