![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/abdc3cf21e0fea6dda52ab42cf43c2fa.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
If ASDF actually advances its deprecation levels in 3.4 (things that are currently style warnings become full warnings), then this bug will cause issues whenever 3.4 comes out: https://abcl.org/trac/ticket/487 Probably not critical to address for 1.9.0, but it is also a spec compliance issue. -Eric On 5/9/22 09:35, Robert Goldman wrote:
I haven't had time for more than running the script and seeing what it prints, but it looks like the current ASDF test suite all passes on ABCL 1.9.0rc1.
I will check and see if there are disabled tests I should try. Our treatment of expected failures is not great.
On 9 May 2022, at 2:29, Mark Evenson wrote:
As of today, Monday, May 8, abcl-1.9.0 has not been released. The rc-1 version of the [release artifacts][1.9.0] has been made public but without PGP signatures. There are a number of smallish looking bugs with the 2022-04-01 Quicklisp that I will try to quickly address today, intending to finish the release process soonish.
[1.9.0]: https://abcl.org/releases/1.9.0
If you have additional patches or bug reports please get them in soon.
-- "A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before but there is nothing to compare to it now."